Academic Emergency Medicine
None
Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Conclusion that patients with low risk heart scores still have benefit at one year (NNT 65) from stress testing is counter to 10 years of evidence that stress tests are not useful or recommended for low HEART score patients.
- Annals podcast Radecki and Spiegel attribute it to the confounder of patients simply getting placed on statins, bp control, risk behavior modification over that 1 year.
- Radecki points out that the only way to confirm that the stress test made a difference would be to have the stress test be a sham test for half the patients.
- Bottom line is that low risk HEART scores should not be admitted for stress tests or referred for stress tests within 1 year.
Predictors of Emergency Physician Productivity in a National Emergency Medicine Group
- no great pearls
- Several Peds suicide screening articles
- Good point from Radecki that these mandated suicide screens at triage are mandates to identify a problem without funding to address the problem, no funding to address the social determinants that improve mental health.
EMCRIT
EMCrit 409 – Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Update 2025 with Jeff Kline
- Can pleuritic chest pain be PERC’d?
- pleuritic cp can be PERC’d, although Jeff Kline does not feel comfortable using PERC if the patient takes their finger and points to a very specific spot but that is
- Kline recommends skipping PERC if the patient has a “red hot ekg” and then lists all the components of the Daniel Score (systematic review):
- TWI in V2 and V3
- Afib
- RBBB
- S1Q3T3
- Sinus Tach
- STE in aVR
- I posted a question to the EMCrit post to ask if Kline needed a certain number of Daniel findings or would a single item from the Daniel score be enough to bypass PERC.
- My gestalt is a single item is enough just like the sinus tach is enough to bypass PERC
PulmCrit – 2025 AHA & ESICM guidelines on post-arrest care
- GREAT POST!
- who needs an emergent left heart catheterization?
- According to the AHA guidelines, there are four indications for emergent catheterization:
- [1] STEMI or STEMI-equivalent (guidelines aren’t using the term OMI yet). The immediate post-arrest ECG often shows ischemic changes, so PCI is indicated if these persist on a repeat ECG. (ESICM 2025)
- [2] Cardiogenic shock attributable to coronary artery disease. (AHA 2025 2A)
- [3] Recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. (AHA 2025 2A)
- [4] Evidence of significant ongoing myocardial ischemia. (AHA 2025 2A) This is a little vague, but it leaves room to exercise clinical judgement.
- pan-CT scans
- Both guidelines support the use of pan-CT scans for post-arrest patients.
- Evaluate for an underlying cause of arrest.
- Evaluate for CPR complications (e.g., splenic laceration).
- Neuroprognostication (low yield initially, but yield increases over several hours).
- These scans don’t usually need to happen immediately. A good time to obtain a scan is often following resuscitation and stabilization in the emergency department, while the patient is en route to the ICU
- Both guidelines support the use of pan-CT scans for post-arrest patients.
- temperature control
- ESICM recommends actively preventing fever by targeting a temperature <37.5
- AHA guidelines recommend maintaining a temperature between 32-37.5C. Honestly, I get the feeling that the AHA is still partying like it’s 2009. The AHA continues to make references to therapeutic hypothermia, whereas the ESICM seems to have moved on.
- I’m really tired of talking about this topic. I’ve discussed this previously in the blog in 2015, 2016, 2019, and 2021 (posts that have aged well, if I may say so).
- Despite Herculean efforts to demonstrate benefits from hypothermia over several decades, RCTs simply haven’t borne out a benefit from hypothermia.
- Neuroprognostication

EMRAP
Case of the Week
Jan Shoenberger, MD, and Anand Swaminathan, MD
Drs. Shoenberger and Swaminathan discuss a fast-track case of penile pain in a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
“Fast-Track” Case
- History of present illness (HPI):
- 58-year-old man with history of ESRD on dialysis with chief complaint of penile pain
- States there is a “wound” on his penis
- Developing over last few months
- Not sexually active, no trauma, burns, or accidental injury
- Vitals stable
- Physical exam:
- Open wound, black area around the head of the penis
- Possibly gangrenous?
- Tender to touch, very painful
- Open wound, black area around the head of the penis
Differential Diagnosis
- Urinary tract infection
- Sexually transmitted infection
- Trauma
- Burn
- Accidental injury
- Necrotizing fasciitis
- History of ESRD → vascular issues?
- Calciphylaxis or calcific uremic arterial disease
- Calcium deposits in arterioles
- Calciphylaxis or calcific uremic arterial disease
Calciphylaxis or Calcific Uremic Arterial Disease
- Calcium deposits in arterioles that can cause rashes
- Presents as painful rash in dialysis patients
- Can look like
- Purpura
- Larger patches of bruising
- Open, painful wounds or necrotic ulcerations
- Usually on lower extremities
- Often mistaken for cellulitis
- Can look like
- Problem with calcium and phosphate balance
- Due to poor renal function and parathyroid hormone
- Calcium levels rise → calcium/phosphate balance is off → calcium deposits cause vasculitis
- Local rather than systemic issue (serum calcium levels are normal)
- Treatment:
- Pain management
- Wound care
- Rule out superinfection or need for debridement
- Vascular surgery consult
- Wound care referral
- Outpatient biopsy
- Prevention:
- Management with nephrologist
- Extra dialysis sessions
- Calcium binders
PEARL: Calciphylaxis or calcific uremic arterial disease is common in ESRD/dialysis patients. Calcium deposits in arterioles can cause painful rashes that will require outpatient nephrology management and close wound care follow-up.
Medicolegal Statistics
- The average ED physician sees between 150,000 and 200,000 patients in their career.
- There will be adverse outcomes!
- Over three-fourths of emergency medicine physicians will be sued by the age of 55.
- About two-thirds of these cases will be dismissed (no malpractice, no payout).
- About 7% of these cases go to trial.
- Defense prevails 85%-90% of the time.
- Some cases are unavoidable.
- Sometimes you can do everything right and still get sued.
- We have a problem equating lawsuits with errors.
- This is a highly stressful time:
- Often starts at time of accusation and persists until resolution
- Medicolegal
- The most common reason for legal action is failure to diagnose.
- Failure to make a correct diagnosis is not necessarily malpractice.
- Good bedside manner and good documentation may help to avoid a lawsuit.
- Median time from visit to filing of lawsuit is 15 months.
- The average time to resolution is 17 months.
- If the case goes to trial, ~4 years to resolution.
- 11% of our careers will be spent in some type of legal action.
Effects of Litigation on Physicians
- Very stressful time in career:
- Suicidical thoughts
- Substance abuse, divorce, career abandonment
- Changes in behavior
- Often, the more compassionate and caring the physician is, the more they have a hard time contending with an event like this.
- The physician may have difficulty managing grief after an adverse event.
- Adverse events are not just lawsuits; they can also be
- Patient complaints
- Near misses
- Things that go to peer review
4 Strategies to Navigate Medicolegal Terrain:
- Wellness and Self-Care
- The biggest barrier is feeling as if you don’t deserve it.
- Feelings of guilt, shame, and grief
- Recognize that adverse events and errors are inherent to the practice of medicine.
- Focus on nutrition, sleep, exercise, and nurturing personal relationships.
- Scheduling time off from work for enjoyable activities.
- Minimizing use of alcohol, drugs, sleep aids.
- Getting mental help that you need.
- Learning skills to interrupt rumination and catastrophizing.
- The biggest barrier is feeling as if you don’t deserve it.
- Developing Your Litigation Skill Set
- Learning on your own
- Following advice of your lawyers
- Resources from professional societies
- Investigate Support Resources
- Peer support group in hospital
- Professional societies
- Books
- Dr. Sara Charles Physician Litigation Stress Resource Center
- Dr. Gita Pensa’s Podcast
- Trauma recovery techniques/therapy
- Reframe How You Think About Ligation Process
- Think of adverse events and litigation as an occupational hazard associated with being an emergency physician.
- Make peace with yourself.
- Know that the plaintiff’s attorney is going to try to make you feel like a bad person and/or a bad doctor.
- Do not internalize this.
- Talk to family or colleagues for support.
- DON’T talk about the details of the case.
- DO talk about how you feel.
- The more we talk about it, the more we normalize it.
PEARL:
- Don’t equate lawsuits with errors.
- The most common reason for legal action is failure to diagnose.
- Failure to make a correct diagnosis is not necessarily malpractice.
- Good bedside manner and good documentation may help to avoid a lawsuit.
- Recognize that adverse events and errors are inherent to the practice of medicine.
- Use various strategies to navigate the medicolegal terrain.
REFERENCES:
Medical malpractice stress syndrome
Cocchiarale F, Gnatowski M Jr, Pensa G. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2025;43(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2024.05.024. PMID: 39515934
Neurocritical Care Mailbag: Multiple Sclerosis
Anand Swaminathan, MD, and Evie Marcolini, MD
Dr. Evie Marcolini and Dr. Anand Swaminathan discuss the recognition and management of multiple sclerosis in the ED.
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
- Diagnosis
- MS is a radiologic and clinical diagnosis.
- McDonald Criteria: one or more lesions in 2 out of 4 central nervous system (CNS) areas and dissemination in time.
- Not an urgent diagnosis; rule out emergent diagnoses and recommend neurology evaluation for MS.
- Lumbar puncture (LP) will show normal white cell count, elevated protein, elevated IgG, kappa light chains, and oligoclonal bands.
- Risk Factors
- Onset between 20 and 30 years of age
- 2-3 times more common in women
- Associated with childhood obesity, cigarette smoking, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and lower vitamin D levels
- Physical Exam
- Unilateral optic neuritis, partial myelitis, focal sensory disturbance, internuclear ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, hearing loss, dysphagia, dysarthria, dysautonomia, bowel or bladder dysfunction, and depression/anxiety
- Lhermitte’s phenomenon: neck flexion causes electric shock-like pain
- Uhthoff phenomenon: symptoms worsen with increased body temperature or exercise
- Flares will present with recurrent, worsening, or gradual onset of different symptoms
- Treatment
- Refer to neurology.
- Consider initiating corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 500-1,000 mg daily oral or intravenous for 3-5 days) while waiting for neurology evaluation.
- Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs):
- Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), monoclonal antibodies, or interferon
- If a patient is taking a DMT, discuss with neurology before prescribing steroids since they are also immunosuppressive
- Diagnosis
PEARL: When a patient presents with symptoms consistent with MS, your role is to rule out dangerous alternative diagnoses.
Cardiology Corner: Calcium in Hyperkalemia
Anand Swaminathan, MD, and Amal Mattu, MD
Does calcium really stabilize cardiac membranes? Drs. Swaminathan and Mattu take a deep dive into the role of calcium in cardiac membrane stabilization in hyperkalemia. Additionally, they discuss the role of various interventions in the reduction of serum potassium levels.
Calcium and Membrane Stabilization
- We have always been taught that calcium works through membrane stabilization in hyperkalemia.
- Restores resting membrane potential
- Study performed on canine myocytes:
- The researchers examined membrane action potentials and electrical conduction at normal and elevated potassium levels.
- Hyperkalemia slows conduction velocity and shortens action potential duration.
- Results in QRS widening and eventually sine wave patterns
- When calcium treated was added:
- Restored conduction velocity → narrowed QRS
- Did not restore action potential duration → no membrane stabilization
- Rather than sodium-dependent conduction, it improves calcium-dependent propagation.
- Bottom line: Calcium works in hyperkalemia but not through “membrane stabilization.”
Hyperkalemia Interventions:
How effective are pharmacological interventions in the acute treatment of hyperkalemia?Pharmacological interventions for the acute treatment of hyperkalaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Insulin
- Insulin lowers potassium by a small to moderate amount.
- Generally, 5 units of insulin (with dextrose) will lower potassium by 0.6 to 1.2 mmol/L and 10 units of insulin will lower potassium by 0.7 to 1.4 mmol/L.
- It takes effect within 30-60 minutes after administration.
- Insulin lowers potassium by a small to moderate amount.
- Sodium bicarbonate
- In some studies, sodium bicarbonate was shown to lower potassium by 0.1 mmol/L.
- In another study, combined with dextrose, it lowered potassium by 0.125 mmol/L
- Sodium bicarbonate has a minor role in lowering potassium.
- Albuterol (beta-agonist)
- Albuterol lowers potassium by ~0.9-1 mmol/L.
- Combination of Therapies
- These therapies are not cumulative or synergistic.
- Combination therapies lower potassium by 1.2 mmol/L.
- Key takeaway
- The amount of reduction of potassium is NOT miraculous; at best, 1.2-1.5 mmol/L.
- Remember that these therapies are shifting potassium from intravascular to intracellular, which is not permanent or definitive!
- Definitive therapies (diuresis, dialysis) are important.
PEARL: Regardless of whether or not calcium actually stabilizes cardiac membranes, if a patient has hyperkalemia ECG changes, give them calcium. Stabilize the patient! Hyperkalemia therapies are important but temporary. Definitive therapies (diuresis, dialysis) are ideal.
REFERENCES:
Beneficial effect of calcium treatment for hyperkalemia is not due to “membrane stabilization”
Piktel JS, Wan X, Kouk S, et al. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(10):1499-1508. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006376. PMID: 39046789
Pharmacological interventions for the acute treatment of hyperkalaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Jessen MK, Andersen LW, Djakow J, et al. Resuscitation. 2025;208:110489. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110489. PMID: 39761907
EMA 2025 September Abstract 16: TRiP Score-Based Anticoagulation for Lower Limb Immobilization
EMA EDITOR’S COMMENTARY: This large pragmatic stepped-wedge trial from Europe evaluated a risk-based approach to VTE prophylaxis for patients with lower extremity injuries requiring immobilization. By using the TRIP(cast) score to identify low-risk patients, the intervention safely decreased thromboprophylaxis use by nearly 50%—a clinically meaningful result. In patients with TRIP(cast) scores <7, the untreated VTE rate was low (0.7%) and well within the safety threshold. However, the applicability of these findings to U.S. practice is somewhat limited, because routine prophylaxis for ankle and foot injuries is uncommon in American EDs. Still, the findings reinforce the safety of forgoing anticoagulation in select low-risk patients and suggest that more judicious use of prophylaxis can be supported by a structured risk score. An unanswered question for future research is the optimal strategy for patients at higher risk, who had a 2.8% VTE rate despite prophylaxis.
EMA 2025 September Abstract 18: Physical Exam Tests for Acute Shoulder Injuries with Normal X-Rays
EMA EDITOR’S COMMENTARY: Two simple physical examination maneuvers of the shoulder—the inability to abduct above 90° and a small finger resistance test—identified more than 90% of acute full-thickness rotator cuff injuries with approximately 70% specificity in this small single-center study. Although the results are limited by a modest sample size, a non-ED setting, and potential concerns about the reliability of ultrasound as the reference standard, few comparable data are available in EM populations. For EM physicians searching for actionable bedside guidance in patients with shoulder injury, this study offers a practical starting point, even if it’s not definitive.
Crit Bits: Advanced Chest Drains
Haney Mallemat, MD, and Anand Swaminathan, MD
Dr. Haney Mallemat joins Dr. Swaminathan for the second part of a series on chest tube management. This section focuses on analgesia, drain management, and troubleshooting chest tubes.
- Regional blocks for analgesia
- Regional blocks provide excellent pain control for chest tube insertion and underlying pathology (eg, rib fractures, hemothorax).
- Use for trauma cases with significant pain; local anesthetic ± sedation is often enough for small-bore drains in medical effusions.
- Options:
- Serratus plane block uses an anterior/lateral approach for chest wall coverage.
- Erector spinae block uses a posterior approach for broad coverage.
- Choice depends on tube location and provider comfort.
- See linked videos below for how to do these blocks
- Drainage strategy
- Use suction (-20 cm H2O) over water seal for most ED cases to speed re-expansion and improve respiratory distress.
- Drain to dry; there is no evidence-based “1 L max” limit.
- Recognize that re-expansion pulmonary edema is a risk but is rare.
- The positive effect of drainage to improvement in clinical status likely outweighs the theoretical risks of developing pulmonary edema.
- Manage with positive pressure and diuresis if it develops.
- Central chest pain can be an early symptom
- Cough/ipsilateral pleuritic pain are common after any chest tube placement and do not necessarily indicate re-expansion pulmonary edema.
- Troubleshooting nondraining chest tubes
- Confirm placement/function with 4 steps:
- Drainage
- Fluid/air present in chest tube
- Tidaling
- Fluid column moves with respiration
- Bubbling
- Expected with pneumothorax
- Continuous bubbling can also be due to leak/fistula
- Skin exam for subcutaneous air
- May indicate side holes outside the pleura
- Drainage
- Address drainage failure:
- Consider a trapped/entrapped lung.
- CT or specialty consult to assess for this
- If the tube is too high above fluid, add a second lower pigtail under ultrasound guidance.
- Consider a trapped/entrapped lung.
- Confirm placement/function with 4 steps:
PEARL: Consider regional blocks for chest tube analgesia; use suction for symptomatic patients, and don’t fear draining large volumes as re-expansion edema is rare and manageable. Always confirm tube function by checking for drainage, tidaling, bubbling, and ruling out subcutaneous air.
References:
Imaging: Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Nerve Block
NEJM
Goals for Opioid Use Disorder Medications — Protection, Remission, and Recovery
Emergency Medicaid at Risk — Preserving State Authority and Access to Care
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
Educational Strategies to Prepare Trainees for Clinical Uncertainty
REBELEM
The Rise of BISAP Is Ranson Retiring?
- Designed for early, point-of-care mortality risk estimation in acute pancreatitis using fewer variables than Ranson’s.
- Most useful in the ED or acute care setting to help guide initial disposition and triage decisions
REBEL Core Cast – DKA: Beyond the Basics Part 2 – SCOPE DKA-Trial
Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder

Our Recommendations
- Offer Medications:
- For patients who screen positive for AUD or express interest in reducing alcohol intake, discuss evidence-based options such as naltrexone or acamprosate.
- If No Screening Protocol Exists:
- Use the full AUDIT tool or simply ask patients if they would like medications to help reduce cravings.
- Before Starting Naltrexone:
- Ask about opioid use history.
- Administer a 0.4 mg IV naloxone challenge dose.
- If no precipitated withdrawal occurs, proceed with treatment.
- Initiate Treatment:
- Oral: Start with 50 mg PO naltrexone.
- Injectable: Start with 380 mg IM naltrexone.
- Discharge Planning:
- If PO naltrexone is given, discharge with a 14–30 day prescription (50 mg daily).
- If IM naltrexone is given, schedule follow-up in one month with primary care or addiction medicine.
- Ensure Continuity of Care:
- Connect all patients started on therapy with both addiction medicine and primary care for ongoing follow-up




































